A roundup of filings, motions, and memoranda in the lawsuit
In October of last year, the Defenders of Wildlife and the National
Audubon Society, represented by the Southern Environmental Law Center,
filed a motion in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North
Carolina. The motion claimed that the National Park
Service’s Interim Plan to protect wildlife on the Cape Hatteras
National Seashore is inadequate. The complaint went on to say
that since the park has no long-range plan for ORV use, as is required
by law, that ORV use is illegal and should be prohibited.
In December, the judge allowed Dare and Hyde counties and the Cape
Hatteras Access Preservation Alliance to intervene in the lawsuit on
behalf of the people of Hyde and Dare County and visitors to the
In February, attorneys for the intervenors asked Judge Terrence Boyle
to dismiss three of the six claims in the lawsuit by the environmental
Also, on Feb. 20, the environmental groups asked that the judge issue a
temporary injunction to stop beach driving on the seashore’s most
popular recreational beaches until the lawsuit is settled.
On March 14, federal attorneys filed a response for the motion for the injunction, as did attorneys for the intervenors.
And, also on March 14, the environmental groups filed a memorandum of
law in opposition to the intervenors’ request to dismiss some of
We can say that these memoranda, responses, and other filings are not
casual reading material, but some of The Island Free Press readers want
to be familiar with all of the filings on all sides of this beach
So, if you want to plow through them, we list them below. Some stories
about specific filings can be found on this Beach Access Issues Page.
And just a reminder of the cast of characters:
Plaintiffs – Defenders of Wildlife and National Audubon Society, represented by the Southern Environmental Law Center.
Defendants – National Park Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Secretary of the Department of Interior, Cape Hatteras
National Seashore superintendent, director of USFWS.
Defendant/Intervenors – Dare and Hyde counties and the Cape Hatteras Access Preservation Alliance.
Judge -- Terrence Boyle, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of North Carolina, Northern Division.
For the Southern Environmental Law Center complaint against the Park
Service, filed Oct. 18, go the SELC Web site and look under legal
documents on the right side of the page at the bottom.
To read the request by the environmental groups for a temporary
injunction against beach driving, go to the SELC Web site and click on
legal documents on the right side of the page at the bottom.
To read the Memorandum of Law by attorney for defendant intervenors
(Dare and Hyde counties and the Cape Hatteras Access Preservation
Alliance), which was filed on Feb. 21 and asks the court to dismiss
many of the claims in the lawsuit, go to:
Click Here To Read Memorandum
To read the Memorandum of Law, filed by the SELC on March 14, that opposes the motion to dismiss, go to:
Click Here To Read Memorandum
To read the response to the request for the temporary injunction by federal attorneys:
Click here for the complete text of the federal defendants response
To read the response to the request for the temporary injunction by the attorneys for the intervenors:
To read the complete response from the attorneys for the intervenors, click here: