May 15, 2013
UPDATE: Bill to overturn Park Service’s
ORV plan will go to House for a vote
By IRENE NOLAN
The U.S. House
of Representatives Committee on Natural Resources today favorably
reported H.R. 819 to overturn the Park Service’s new off-road vehicle
plan on the Cape Hatteras National Seashore.
The vote was 24 to
17 in favor of sending the bill to the House floor for a vote, with
Republicans favoring the bill and Democrats opposing it.
819, the Preserving Access to Cape Hatteras National Seashore
Recreational Area Act, was introduced in the House by U.S. Rep. Walter
Jones, R-N.C., on Feb. 26. The U.S. House of Representatives
Subcommittee on Public Lands and Environmental Regulation received
testimony on H.R. 819 in a March hearing.
The legislation would
overturn both the National Park Service’s final rule for off-road
vehicles on the Cape Hatteras National Seashore and a court-approved
consent decree that settled a lawsuit filed against the Park Service by
environmental groups. It would return management of seashore resources
to the Interim Protected Species Management Strategy and Environmental
Assessment, issued by the Park Service on June 13, 2007.
819 was one of 18 bills that were marked up – or voted on – today by
the full committee in a marathon meeting that began at 10 a.m. and
didn’t end until about 3:20 p.m. The committee’s very last action
was the vote on Jones’ bill.
Several public lands bills engendered heated debate between Democrats and Republicans.
However, there was no debate on the H.R. 819.
the end of the long meeting, committee member Rob Bishop, R-Utah, asked
to enter comments in favor of the bill into the record, but did not
talk about the bill nor did member Raul Grijalva, D-Ariz., who entered
comments opposing the bill.
A similar bill last year was
favorably voted out of committee and sent to the House floor, where it
passed, largely along party lines.
There is a companion bill to overturn the ORV plan in the U.S. Senate that will be voted on tomorrow by the Senate’s Energy and Natural Resources Committee.
That vote is likely to be tougher for the supporters of S 486, since the Senate is controlled by Democrats.
comments powered by